Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Monday, January 3, 2011

Obama to increase engagement with Africa in 2011

By JULIE PACE - AP | Published: 4:42 AM 01/03/2011

FILE - In this July 11, 2009, file photo, President Barack Obama takes the stage as he participates in a departure ceremony at the airport in Accra, Ghana. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

FILE - In this July 11, 2009, file photo, President Barack Obama speaks at a departure ceremony at the airport in Accra, Ghana. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari, File)

FILE - In this July 11, 2009, file photo, President Barack Obama addresses the Ghanaian Parliament in Accra, Ghana. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

FILE - In this July 11, 2009, file phto, President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama visit the La General Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari, File)

FILE - In this July 11, 2009, file photo, a Ghanaian police officer mans a security barrier ahead of the arrival of President Barack Obama, at the Presidential Castle in Accra, Ghana. Obama is quietly but strategically stepping up his outreach to Africa, using this year to increase his engagement with a continent that is personally meaningful to him and important to U.S. interests. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)



This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Obama war review claims progress in degrading Taliban, warns gains are fragile, reversible

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Friday, December 17, 2010

Obama urges Congress to pass agreement on tax cuts

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Obama to attend National Christmas Tree lighting

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Monday, November 29, 2010

Obama calls airport pat-downs frustrating but necessary

President Obama said today he sympathizes with passenger complaints about aggressive body pat-downs at airports, but his counter-terrorism aides say they are necessary to guard against hidden explosives.

Balancing privacy and security is a “tough situation,” Obama told reporters at a news conference following the NATO summit in Lisbon, Portugal.

“One of the most frustrating aspects of this fight against terrorism is that it has created a whole security apparatus around us that causes a huge inconvenience for all of us,” Obama said.

Full story:?Obama calls airport pat-downs frustrating but necessary – The Oval: Tracking the Obama presidency

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Barack Obama does a right-turn on Afghanistan

The media have it wrong. According to them, the big news out of the NATO summit in Lisbon, Portugal, is the 2014 withdrawal date from Afghanistan.

In truth, the big news out of Lisbon is that Obama and NATO have abandoned any definitive timeline for military operations in Afghanistan. America and NATO, it seems, are going to stay there until the mission is complete and a sovereign, stable and self-sufficient Afghan state is assured.

To be sure, the “goal” or “target date” for ending offensive allied combat operations in Afghanistan is 2014. But as Obama himself acknowledged today in Lisbon, that may or may not happen, depending upon conditions on the ground. And so, “I’ll make that determination when I get there,” the president said in today’s press conference.

In any case, he added: American troops will remain in Iraq and Afghanistan for many years to come in order to conduct counterterrorism operations.

This is a big concession and thus big news. It marks a genuine right-turn on Afghanistan. I mean Obama’s newfound commitment to winning and to completing the mission there, his abandonment of hard and fixed deadlines, and his acknowledgement that America will maintain a long-term military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan for many years to come.

Here are Obama’s exact words, in context, after CBS News’ Bill Plante asked him whether he (Obama) would “keep U.S. troops committed [in Afghanistan] in a combat role [after 2014] if necessary.”

The other thing that I’m pretty confident we will still be doing after 2014 is maintaining a counterterrorism capability until we have confidence that al-Qaeda is no longer operative — and is no longer a threat to the American homeland and to American allies and personnel around the world.

And so, it’s going to be important for us to continue to have platforms to be able to execute those counterterrorism operations. And that’s true in Iraq as well. And obviously that’s even more true when it comes to core al-Qaeda.

You know, we don’t want, after having made these extraordinary efforts by so many countries — we don’t want to have to suddenly find ourselves in a situation where they [al-Qaeda] waited us out and they reconsolidated it [their military capabilities].

What accounts for Obama’s abrupt right-turn? I think it’s Gen. Petraeus and the performance of our troops on the ground. Media reports to the contrary notwithstanding, the surge in Afghanistan is shaping up to be as successful as the surge in Iraq. Obama recognizes this; and he knows that it would be unwise to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Ironically, then, Obama, who ran for office as an anti-war candidate, and whose base of support comes from the far-left anti-war fringe, may well win reelection as a successful war president.

We can thank Obama for not being reckless and for heeding the advice and counsel of his military advisers. But we can especially thank Gens. McChrystal and Petraeus: because they are the farsighted and visionary leaders who laid out the grand military strategy necessary to achieve victory in Afghanistan.

Petraeus especially seems to have saved two American presidents, Bush and Obama, from themselves — and not only from themselves, but also from their political advisers, from the media, and from the military and civil service bureaucracies. Petraeus and McChrystal deserve our thanks and our praise.

John R. Guardiano is a writer and analyst in Arlington, Virginia. He writes and blogs for a variety of publications, including FrumForum, the American Spectator and The Daily Caller. Follow him at his personal blog, ResoluteCon.com, and on Twitter @JohnRGuardiano.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Monday, November 1, 2010

Poll: Democrats divided over Obama 12 appointment delivery

WASHINGTON (AP)--an Associated Press-knowledge networks poll Democratic voters were closely divided on whether President Barack Obama should be challenged to the party for a second term in 2012, concludes.

This is city in the nation as a whole, which is also divided on whether Obama evaluation must be a President of a term.

A real democratic challenge Obama seems unlikely at this stage and his re-election is far offshore. But the findings highlight how disillusioned his party took position on Tuesday congressional elections.

KN - AP poll has followed a group of people and their points of view since the beginning of the 2008 presidential campaign.Among all voters in 2008, 51 percent say he deserves to be defeated in November 2012 while 47% support his re-election - essentially a tie.

Among Democrats, 47% say Obama should be challenged the nomination in 2012 and 51 percent say that it should not be opposé.Ceux fosters competition include more who supported Hillary Rodham Clinton failed against Obama for the 2008 nominating faceoff.The survey did not ask if Democrats endorse specific challengers.

Political officers and experts vote warns that survey ranking of the Obama say more now popular frustration with economic and other conditions as on its prospects for réélection.Avec the next presidential election, two years more far - an Eon in politics - Obama public opinion could improve easily if the economy revives, or he outmaneuvers Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the presidential campaign.

Despite this, survey illustrates how the reputation of the Obama was chafed since 2008.Il suggests that lingering bad feelings of primary for the Democrats, when bitter fight he and Clinton - now his Secretary of State - about splitting the popular vote. Professionals of the policies of both parties said that conclusions are a warning to the President, whose formal re-election effort should start stirring next year.

"An indicator of things, it must respond, between", stated Kiki McLean, a Democratic strategist who worked in the Clinton 2008 campaign.

The White House has refused to comment on the results.

1,254 People chosen randomly in the survey are a group who has interviewed campaign 2008 11 times by AP, Yahoo News and knowledge networks. The survey finds that during this period, Obama retained supporters most seeing erosion:

-Presque 3 to 10% of Democrats said in the spring of 2008 that they safeguard Obama for the Democratic nomination now say they want to be challenged by 2012.Seven out of ten wants to be eligible for re-election.

-Sixty-one percent of Democrats said in the spring of 2008, they have been backing Clinton now say Obama must confront an adversary for the nomination of the party.

-More than 8 10 who, election 2008, day said they voted for Obama want to re-elect him, well that 1 in 7 say that it must be defeated.

-More than 1/4 stated in October 2008 that Obama understands the problems of ordinary Americans now say that it does.Same applies to those who said it is innovative, concern people like them and their shared values.

-Of those who said right after the election of 2008 that they had a favorable opinion of Obama, close to a quarter now consider negatively.

"Nobody wants to work with this guy," said Steven Fagin, 45, Democrat Cincinnati.Un and Obama 2008 voter, he cited the deep divisions between Democrats and Republicans."We want to ever get anything done."

The survey revealed that those inclined to oppose the re-election of the Obama include men, seniors, those without College degrees and white.These groups caught mainly in charge of his Republican opponent, 2008, John McCain.

Three to four Democrats want Obama re-elected while that nearly 9 out of 10 Republicans y opposer.Indépendants lean slightly against Obama, 46-36%.

Democrats saying that Obama must facing a primary challenge tend to be less educated, less liberal and most likely to have been 2008 hawkish Clinton supporters.

Democratic activists say there is no sign of a serious challenge to Obama, although some felt that an effort could come from the Liberals who believe that it is derived from too far from the Centre.

Recent history shows the number of vote early Presidents means little on their re-election prospects.

At this point two years before their re-election, Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton were rating that was lower than that of the Obama now survey Gallup.les two men won a second mandat.Les ratings Presidents George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were better than two Obama.les lost.

"Mondale Presidents, Dole, and McCain all speak very substantial results off the coast of the year poll limits says Bill McInturff 2008 pollster McCain, because he has appointed three politicians who fell House blanche.Walter Mondale lost to Reagan in 1988 while Clinton defeated Bob Dole in 1996."

AP-knowledge networks poll was conducted from 17 September to 7 octobre.Le initial adult bench was chosen at random to traditional telephone voting methods, but interviews were conducted in ligne.Personnes without computers or Internet access received this technology free of charge.

The margin of error for all adults 1,254 sampling is more or less pourcentage.Il 4.4 points is more or less 6.5 points for 571 Democrats and 5.3 for 852 people who said the day of the 2008 election they voted.

___

Director associated press poll Trevor efficacy, Assistant Director of polling Jennifer Agiesta, News about specialist Dennis Junius and political writer Liz Sidoti contributed to this report.

___

Online:

http://Surveys.AP.org

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.


View the original article here

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Clint Eastwood think governing the of the Obama

Sorry, that readability was unable to scan this page for content.

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.


View the original article here